Godthings

  1. Search
  2. Ask
  3. Subscribe
  4. Archive
  5. Random
Newer
Older
  • “[I]t’s belief that involves the most uncompromising attention to the nature of things of which you are capable. Belief demands that you dispense with illusion after illusion, while contemporary common sense requires continual, fluffy pretending — pretending that might as well be systematic, it’s so thoroughly incentivised by our culture. Take the well-known slogan on the atheist bus in London. I know, I know, that’s an utterance by the hardcore hobbyists of unbelief, but in this particular case they’re pretty much stating the ordinary wisdom of everyday disbelief. The atheist bus says: ‘There’s probably no God. So stop worrying and enjoy your life.’ All right: which word here is the questionable one, the aggressive one, the one that parts company with recognisable human experience so fast it doesn’t even have time to wave goodbye? It isn’t ‘probably’. New Atheists aren’t claiming anything outrageous when they say that there probably isn’t a God. In fact they aren’t claiming anything substantial at all, because, really, how would they know? It’s as much of a guess for them as it is for me. No, the word that offends against realism here is ‘enjoy’. I’m sorry — enjoy your life? I’m not making some kind of neo-puritan objection to enjoyment. Enjoyment is lovely. Enjoyment is great. The more enjoyment the better. But enjoyment is one emotion. To say that life is to be enjoyed (just enjoyed) is like saying that mountains should only have summits, or that all colours should be purple, or that all plays should be by Shakespeare. This really is a bizarre category error.

    But not necessarily an innocent one. Not necessarily a piece of fluffy pretending that does no harm. The implication of the bus slogan is that enjoyment would be your natural state if you weren’t being ‘worried’ by us believers and our hellfire preaching. Take away the malignant threat of God-talk, and you would revert to continuous pleasure, under cloudless skies. What’s so wrong with this, apart from it being total bollocks? Well, in the first place, that it buys a bill of goods, sight unseen, from modern marketing. Given that human life isn’t and can’t be made up of enjoyment, it is in effect accepting a picture of human life in which those pieces of living where easy enjoyment is more likely become the only pieces that are visible. If you based your knowledge of the human species exclusively on adverts, you’d think that the normal condition of humanity was to be a good-looking single person between 20 and 35, with excellent muscle-definition and/or an excellent figure, and a large disposable income. And you’d think the same thing if you got your information exclusively from the atheist bus, with the minor difference, in this case, that the man from the Gold Blend couple has a tiny wrinkle of concern on his handsome forehead, caused by the troublesome thought of God’s possible existence: a wrinkle about to be removed by one magic application of Reason™.

    These plastic beings don’t need anything that they can’t get by going shopping. But suppose, as the atheist bus goes by, you are povertystricken, or desperate for a job, or a drug addict, or social services have just taken away your child. The bus tells you that there’s probably no God so you should stop worrying and enjoy your life, and now the slogan is not just bitterly inappropriate in mood. What it means, if it’s true, is that anyone who isn’t enjoying themselves is entirely on their own. What the bus says is: there’s no help coming. Now don’t get me wrong. I don’t think there’s any help coming, in one large and important sense of the term. I don’t believe anything is going to happen that will materially alter the position these people find themselves in. But let’s be clear about the emotional logic of the bus’s message. It amounts to a denial of hope or consolation on any but the most chirpy, squeaky, bubble-gummy reading of the human situation. St Augustine called this kind of thing ‘cruel optimism’ 1,500 years ago, and it’s still cruel.”

    — Francis Spufford, The trouble with atheists: a defence of faith, The Guardian (via wesleyhill)

    Tagged: Francis Spufford The trouble with atheists: a defence of faith The trouble with atheists The Guardian

    Posted on September 2, 2012 via more than 95 theses with 35 notes ()

    Source: ayjay

    1. fidelishaereticus likes this
    2. gaudete reblogged this from godthings
    3. merovingians likes this
    4. kissfistthat reblogged this from everythingbutharleyquinn
    5. godforbids reblogged this from godthings
    6. pegobry reblogged this from ayjay
    7. spoony-loony likes this
    8. muttton likes this
    9. nixvx likes this
    10. amydentata likes this
    11. everythingbutharleyquinn reblogged this from godthings
    12. variousfield likes this
    13. settledthingsstrange likes this
    14. iamacilius likes this
    15. clownyprincess likes this
    16. thumbsup4rockandroll likes this
    17. smashingice reblogged this from godthings
    18. godthings reblogged this from wesleyhill and added:
      “[I]t’s belief that involves...most uncompromising attention to the nature of things
    19. hours likes this
    20. polishingfirewood likes this
    21. sarazarr likes this
    22. drjpresents likes this
    23. lauracricket likes this
    24. ferretical likes this
    25. mushfromnewsies likes this
    26. freyatlast reblogged this from wesleyhill and added:
      “The funny thing...that, to me, it’s belief that involves
    27. wesleyhill reblogged this from ayjay
    28. ungleichschaltung reblogged this from ayjay
    29. consillyence reblogged this from ayjay
    30. notanordinaryjoe reblogged this from ayjay
    31. bluedollar reblogged this from ayjay
    32. elaienar reblogged this from ayjay
    33. tea77green likes this
    34. ayjay posted this

Field Notes Theme. Designed by Manasto Jones. Powered by Tumblr.